Nao Hibino vs Claire Liu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Aug at 07:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Hibino vs C. Liu

JPN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hibino 2 - 0 Liu
They have played 4 sets in total, with Nao Hibino winning 4 and Claire Liu winning 0. The last match between Nao Hibino and Claire Liu was at the W50 Saskatoon, 13-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hibino | 2 |
| Liu | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) W50 Saskatoon(08-13-25)
(Q1) BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(03-04-19)
N. Hibino vs C. Liu H2H Profile
N. Hibino vs C. Liu Match Preview:
- In recent form, Hibino shows slightly better performance on second serve points, winning 39.02%, compared to Liu's 38.39%. Does this give Hibino an edge? It appears so, as this stat is strongly linked to match predictions.
- When it comes to returning games, Hibino also has a slight advantage, winning 50% of her opponents' second serve points, whereas Liu manages 49.08%.
- Under pressure, Liu has a marginally better record, saving 49.74% of breakpoints compared to Hibino's 49.29%. Will this be decisive? Not necessarily, but it's useful for real-time betting.
- Looking at overall match performance in the past year, Liu has a better win rate with 55.56%, whereas Hibino stands at 45.45%.
- Their best surfaces vary: Hibino excels on Hard courts with a 56% win rate, while Liu performs best on Clay with a 65% win rate. The upcoming match will be crucial in determining the surface advantage.
- Considering tournament levels, Liu has a better win record in lower-tier tournaments (> $10K) with 55.56%, compared to Hibino's 41.18%.
- Head-to-head, Hibino leads, having won the only previous match against Liu in straight sets on a Hard court, with neither player facing a tie-break or deciding set.
- Hibino has faced higher-ranked opponents (average rank 183.55) compared to Liu (average rank 306.63) over the past year, providing her with potentially tougher competition exposure.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Hibino has a higher success rate, winning 63% compared to Liu's 56% in the past year.
- Both players have nearly equal break point conversion rates, with Liu slightly ahead at 41.73% compared to Hibino's 40.84%, a minor advantage to keep in mind.
Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performances, Hibino demonstrates superior statistics primarily in second serve effectiveness and return game proficiency. Although Liu holds a slight edge in breakpoint conversions, Hibino's slight edge in several other key areas may prove more telling.
Both players have specialized surface strengths; however, Hibino's previous success against Liu on a Hard court, coupled with her extensive experience against higher-ranked opponents, suggests she has an advantage. Liu has a better win rate over the past year, but the differences are nuanced.
Overall, based on current trends and past performance, Nao Hibino is the more likely victor in their upcoming match.
Nao Hibino vs Claire Liu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Hibino vs C. Liu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:11:37 | Average Match Time | 1:11:37 |
| 70% (57/81) | 1st Serve % | 60% (59/98) |
| 68% (39/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (28/59) |
| 42% (10/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (14/39) |
| 50% (9/18) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (4/4) |
| 57% (56/98) | Return Points Win % | 40% (32/81) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Hibino Recent Matches Played
C. Liu Recent Matches Played

N. Hibino vs C. Liu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.44% (405/339) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.05% (256/185) |
| 52.93% (903/803) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.61% (582/446) |
| 51.50% (8023/7555) | Games Win/Loss | 52.77% (5021/4493) |
| 56.64% (290/222) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.30% (146/118) |
| 45.45% (55/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.58% (93/51) |
| 57.78% (26/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 51.52% (34/32) | Grass Win/Loss | 52.00% (13/12) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1016 | Aces Total | 1009 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1602 | Total Double Faults | 1223 |
| 1:12:45 | Average Match Time | 1:38:23 |
| 484.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 386.25 |
| 65% (25642/39277) | 1st Serve % | 64% (18533/29020) |
| 61% (15531/25642) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (11309/18533) |
| 46% (6318/13632) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4801/10486) |
| 47% (2277/4794) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1723/3637) |
| 45% (17671/39513) | Return Points Win % | 46% (13014/28278) |
| 47.56% (39/43) | Slam W/L | 47.92% (23/25) |
| 42.42% (28/38) | Masters W/L | 45.24% (19/23) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.82% (103/108) | Main Tour W/L | 52.94% (54/48) |
| 59.41% (202/138) | Challenger W/L | 63.79% (155/88) |
| 82.76% (24/5) | Futures W/L | 83.33% (5/1) |
| 54% (398/732) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (252/435) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 57% (87/152) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (58/113) |
| 56% (125/222) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (76/149) |
| 86% (382/329) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (248/211) |
| 13% (382/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (248/36) |
| 20% (362/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (193/44) |